We’ve collected a number of great questions about Christianity and the Bible from our campus this week. One of the most disheartening questions are those that question the authority and historicity of scripture. Simply put, some college students know just enough Bible history to be dangerous. They may have read a Dan Brown novel, researched on Wikipedia, or watched a Bible documentary on the History Channel; unfortunately, these sources aren't infallible to say the least.
One question we received wondered why a corrupt church determined which gospels were canonized. The idea that the lost gospels or gnostic texts emerged as orthodox is simply bad history. Believing there were over eighty gospels is a gross embellishment. They assert only four were chosen for emperor Constantine’s power and political leverage. What liberal scholars won’t tell you is the evidence that the four gospels were canonized by the end of the second century well before any of the lost gospels or gnostic texts were written. One of my professors in seminary wrote his dissertation on Ireneaus of Lyon’s famous 2nd century writing called, “Against Heresies”.
My professor said, “Why did Ireneaus already believe the four gospels were canon by the 2nd century rather than the lost gospels which most didn’t exist until well after Nicea? The implication is that those gospels were not written by their supposed author”
Even if these lost gospels were credible, they are a far cry from the Jesus liberal historians like Ehrman are trying to recreate because Jesus is far too divine in the lost gospels. The gnostic Gospel of Thomas says that Jesus is omnipresent. This gospel was the result of a gnostic heretical teaching called docetism.
It seems clear to me given the amount of overwhelming evidence we have for Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, that these 4 were canonized and withstood the test of time for a divine reason. There's historical value in learning about the lost gospels, but there are more reasons than just dating why these weren't canonized.
We have over 5,700 greek manuscripts of the four gospels that exhibit miniscule textual variances. This is more evidence than all of antiquity combined. I am overwhelmingly confident with the authority and historicity of scripture they way we have preserved it today for these reasons and infinite more.
We have over 5,700 greek manuscripts of the four gospels that exhibit miniscule textual variances. This is more evidence than all of antiquity combined. I am overwhelmingly confident with the authority and historicity of scripture they way we have preserved it today for these reasons and infinite more.









